<REMOTE  VIEWING

 

  

MY REMOTE VIEWING PROTOCOLS

This is already an old page and shows some of the earliest remote viewing protocols I was testing as I was investigating the variables of remote viewing and working toward developing a protocol which would bring scientifically valid results. Since these protocols here, I have continued with other protocols which are listed elsewhere not here. Only what I call the "normal protocol" produces the best remote viewing performance, all other protocols should be considered experimental protocols because they make one or several of the variables complicated, which is how more can be learned about remote viewing.

These remote viewing pages are gradually moving to the new website!


Unfortunately I started out naming my different RV protocols as "stages". I named them stages because I thought that I was gradually evolving the protocol from its starting beginnings and up toward a protocol that would work better to do a test to see if remote viewing could be proven in a scientific test, so I was gradually bringing the normal protocol toward a scientific protocol through "stages". This choice of name is unfortunate, because in the standard school of RV, "stages 1 through 6" denotes the different levels of advancement and skill in remote viewing. I have since started to take down my use of the term "stage" away from my writing and documentation, however the term "stage" will always remain at least in the session videos where I talk about it by that name.

When you find me mentioning "stages" it refers to my different test protocols, and not to the stages in standard RV which instead means advancement and skill level.

The first stage was to do 40 remote viewing test targets to see what I get just by looking at numbers which are connected to a target that needs to be described by remote viewing. Follow the link below to see how it went:

But 40 targets was not enough because I enjoy remote viewing targets individually, so I am doing more targets under the Stage 1 procedure:

The results from the set of 40 test targets was more than sufficient to justify setting up test targets under more rigorous testing conditions. In Stage 2 I attempted a group matching format, which presented some problems but here is how it went:

The Stage 2 test procedure needs to be revised. Stage 3 will attempt to address the problems I had with the Stage 2 procedure but without lowering the scientific standard of the procedure.

The fourth remote viewing procedure will have one blind target which belongs to one out of five different picture categories. I am to match the picture to one out of the five picture categories. This enables a quantitative assessment of the results, with a 1 in 5 probability in each session.

The fifth remote viewing procedure is much similar to the fourth procedure, but here instead of matching my report to one out of five picture categories, after my session is complete I get to see five pictures to choose one of the five pictures. The results are quantitative with a 1 in 5 probability for each target.

Stage 1B is pretty much done under the Stage 1 procedure except these targets are created by Matthew who is not a remote viewer himself. Also some of the variables we work with are different than in my previous work with Stage 1 targets. We shall see how it goes.

The sixth protocol Stage 6 will be one real target remote viewed individually. After the remote viewing when I have created a report, one or several false target pictures will be selected. I match my report to one of the pictures.